Usman slams the White House UFC card concept. He bluntly
criticizes plans for six title fights. He warns it will bore viewers to sleep.
.jfif "Usman Slams White House UFC Card: Six Title Fights? I’ll Be Asleep")
The former champion calls stacking championship bouts a
flawed idea. He believes it creates boredom, not excitement. This directly
challenges Dana White’s marquee vision for the historic event.
The
Core of Usman’s Criticism: Why Champions Don’t Deliver Bar Fights
Explaining why Usman slams the white House UFC card, he targeted the fundamental nature of championship bouts.
On his “Pound 4 Pound” podcast, he contrasted
the calculated, risk-averse strategy of titleholders with the desperate
aggression of contenders.
Champions aren’t going out there like, ‘Yeah, we’re going
to throw caution to the wind and just swing for the fences like we’re in a bar
fight, Usman stated.
He believes fans prefer the high-stakes urgency of
contender fights, where athletes take greater risks to earn a shot at gold,
over the tactical, potentially slower-paced five-round marathons that define
title defences.
The Logistical Challenge: Marathon Cards and Viewer Fatigue
Beyond the style of fight, Usman slammed the white House UFC card on a practical level, questioning viewers’ stamina.
Read also: Dhurandhar Hits Netflix This January: OTT Release Date Set
Who the f*ck wants to watch seven title fights
back-to-back?” he asked co-host Henry Cejudo.
His concern highlights a significant risk for the UFC:
even the most historic venue cannot compensate for a fatigued audience.
A six-fight championship line-up could last over six
hours, potentially diluting the significance of each main event and leading to
a decline in viewer engagement by the time the headline bout arrives.
The White House Spectacle vs. Fight Night Fundamentals
The debate is intensified because Usman slams the white House UFC card while the promotion is focused on the unprecedented spectacle.
With stars like Conor McGregor and Jon Jones lobbying for
spots, the event is designed for maximum political and cultural impact.
Usman’s critique serves as a reminder that the core
product, entertaining fights, must remain the priority.
He implies that the UFC risks prioritizing symbolic
grandeur over fan experience, which could backfire if the card becomes a
marathon of cautious, strategic battles that fail to captivate a mainstream
audience.
Industry Reaction and Potential Adjustments
Usman’s critique has sparked debate among MMA fans. Some
agree with his pacing concerns. Others value the event’s historic prestige more.
The UFC must now choose a path. It can reduce title
fights for better pacing. Or it can be that the White House spectacle sustains
interest.
The promotion may add contender bouts for energy. This
would balance the card’s flow. Usman’s warning highlights a key production
challenge.
Source Information:
This report is based on Kamaru
Usman’s comments on the “Pound 4 Pound” podcast with Henry Cejudo.
Listen
to the full episode: Pound
4 Pound Podcast